1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 622 So.2d
  5. 622 So.2d 173 (1993)
 

BANTA v. PHILLIPS COMPANY/UNIVERSAL STUDIOS

No. 91-3026.

622 So.2d 173 (1993)

Jeffrey BANTA, Appellant, v. PHILLIPS COMPANY/UNIVERSAL STUDIOS and Aetna Life and Casualty Co., Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 12, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard D. Gish of Leon M. Boyajan, II, P.A., Inverness, for appellant.

Torben S. Madson, III, of Rissman, Weisberg, Barrett & Hurt, P.A., Orlando, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appealed order is affirmed, except insofar as the judge addressed the question of maximum medical improvement and the existence of any permanent impairment. It was not necessary for the judge to address these matters to resolve the claim, and they were not within the scope of the issues presented for adjudication. The judge thus should not have entered a ruling as to these matters. See e.g., Scott Smith Oldsmobile v. Hoffard,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases