MATTER OF HOGAN v. GOODSPEED


82 N.Y.2d 710 (1993)

622 N.E.2d 293

602 N.Y.S.2d 793

In the Matter of Daniel V. Hogan et al., Appellants, v. Sterling T. Goodspeed et al., Respondents. In the Matter of William E. Montgomery, III, Appellant, v. Sterling T. Goodspeed et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided August 26, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas J. Spargo, East Berne, for appellants.

Bartlett Pontiff Stewart & Rhodes, Glens Falls (Richard J. Bartlett of counsel), for Sterling T. Goodspeed, respondent.

Thomas M. Lawson, County Attorney of Warren County, Lake George (Brian S. Reichenbach of counsel), for Warren County Board of Elections, respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SIMONS, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., BELLACOSA and SMITH.


On petitioner Montgomery's appeal, order affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the Per Curiam opinion at the Appellate Division (196 A.D.2d 675).

Appeal by petitioners Hogan and Freebern dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the two-Justice dissent at the Appellate Division was not a dissent in their favor (CPLR...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases