BACHOVCHIN v. STINGLEY

No. C4-93-146.

504 N.W.2d 288 (1993)

John BACHOVCHIN, Respondent, v. Roger STINGLEY, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Donald CHESNEY, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

August 17, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert N. Roningen, Duluth, for John Bachovchin, Respondent.

Stephanie A. Ball, Fryberger, Buchanan, Smith & Frederick, P.A., Duluth, for Roger Stingley, defendant and third-party plaintiff, Appellant.

Mark A. Munger, MacDonald, Munger, Downs & Munger, Duluth, for Donald Chesney, et al., Respondents.

Considered and decided by LANSING, P.J., and CRIPPEN and SCHUMACHER, JJ.


OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

In an appeal from the denial of posttrial motions for taxable costs, disbursements, attorney's fees, and statutory penalties, we affirm the district court's holding that actual damages are a necessary predicate to penalties and remedies provided in Minn. Stat. § 325E.16 (1992).

FACTS

This is a dispute over court costs and statutory penalties in litigation arising from Roger Stingley's sale of a car to John Bachovchin...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases