Contrary to defendant's contention, his statements were not the product of custodial interrogation. Defendant, who with his accomplice had been handcuffed, spoke up upon hearing a police officer question the superintendent as to whether defendant was on the premises with his permission. Defendant was not induced or provoked into challenging the superintendent...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.