CONOPCO, INC. v. WATHNE LTD.


190 A.D.2d 587 (1993)

Conopco, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, v. Wathne Limited, Appellant-Respondent, et al., Counterclaim Defendant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

February 18, 1993


The parties' intention to be bound by the letter dated February 12, 1988 is evidenced by its language and terms, and it is such manifestation of the parties' intention, rather than actual or real intention, which controls (Four Seasons Hotels v Vinnik, 127 A.D.2d 310, 317; 21 NY Jur 2d, Contracts, § 29). Thus, the deposition testimony of Robin Burns regarding her subjective understanding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases