1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 122 Wn.2d
  5. 122 Wn.2d 648 (1993)
 

KING COUNTY v. BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD

No. 59249-7.

122 Wn.2d 648 (1993)

860 P.2d 1024

KING COUNTY, Respondent, v. WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FOR KING COUNTY, ET AL, Appellants.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

November 4, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christine O. Gregoire, Attorney General, and Robert C. Kaufman, Special Assistant, for appellant Boundary Review Board.

Preston Thorgrimson Shidler Gates & Ellis, by Fredric C. Tausend and Eric S. Laschever; Michael Reynolds, City Attorney, for appellants Black Diamond Associates, et al.

Cairncross & Hempelmann, P.S., by John W. Hempelmann and Alan L. Wallace, for appellant Plum Creek Timber Co.

Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, Charles E. Maduell, Senior Deputy, and H. Kevin Wright, Deputy, for respondent.

UTTER, J.

This complex case involves the interaction and application of three of our major land use regulatory statutes: the growth management act, RCW 36.70A (GMA), the boundary review board act, RCW 36.93 (BRB Act), and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, RCW 43.21C (SEPA). Specifically at issue is the approval by the Boundary Review Board for King County (Board) of two proposed annexations by the City of Black...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases