Contrary to defendant's claim on appeal, the court did not err in allowing the defendant's son to testify under oath. The court conducted an extensive voir dire of the 9½ year old, and the boy's responses support the finding that he was capable of understanding the nature of an oath (People v Graham,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.