1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 193 A.D.2d
  5. 193 A.D.2d 566 (1993)
 

GOLD v. KATZ

193 A.D.2d 566 (1993)

598 N.Y.S.2d 205

Mark J. Gold, Respondent, v. Manuel L. Katz et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 27, 1993

We agree with the IAS Court that the fee-sharing agreement alleged by plaintiff for the period that he was "Of Counsel" to defendant law firm was capable of performance within a year (see, Apostolos v R.D.T. Brokerage Corp., 159 A.D.2d 62, 64, citing Boening v Kirsch Beverages, 63 N.Y.2d 449, 454), and therefore not barred by General Obligations Law § 5-701 (a) (1). Not only...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases