1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 261 N.J.
  5. 261 N.J. Super. 495 (1993)
 

AYR COMPOSITION, INC. v. ROSENBERG

261 N.J. Super. 495 (1993)

619 A.2d 592

AYR COMPOSITION, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FRED ROSENBERG, TOM MARGUCCIO DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS CROSS-APPELLANTS, AND CHERENSON, CARROLL & HOLZER, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY TRADING UNDER THE FICTITIOUS NAME OF THE CHERENSON GROUP, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 8, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Antonio Inacio argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Inacio, on the brief).

Dore R. Beinhaker argued the cause for respondents-cross-appellants (Gulkin & Beinhaker, attorneys; Alexander J. Graziano, on the brief).

Before Judges DREIER and SKILLMAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by DREIER, J.A.D.

Plaintiff, AYR Composition, Inc. (AYR), appeals from a judgment in its favor in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Union County, which limited damages to commissions earned by defendants Rosenberg and Marguccio on accounts transferred to Cherenson, Carroll & Holzer, a corporation (Cherenson). Plaintiff seeks modification of the trial judge's award of damages to state a fixed sum to be recoverable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases