PER CURIAM.
Because we conclude that the record before this court does not conclusively refute the appellant Jessie Wilcox' facially viable claim that he did not receive effective assistance of counsel at trial because his trial counsel allegedly refused to allow him to testify as a witness in his own defense [a conclusion which the state candidly agrees with], we reverse the trial court order under review which summarily denies the appellant's motion to vacate judgment...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
