1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.2d
  4. 81 N.Y.2d
  5. 81 N.Y.2d 670 (1993)
 

ADVANCED REFRACTORY v. PASNY

81 N.Y.2d 670 (1993)

623 N.E.2d 6

603 N.Y.S.2d 285

Advanced Refractory Technologies, Inc., et al., Appellants, Michael C. O'Laughlin, Plaintiff, v. Power Authority of the State of New York, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided October 12, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hodgson, Russ, Andrews, Woods & Goodyear, Buffalo (Victor T. Fuzak, Richard F. Campbell and Kevin M. Kearney of counsel), and Douglas J. Crowley, Corporation Counsel of Niagara Falls (Thomas M. O'Donnell of counsel), for appellants.

Arthur T. Cambouris, Charles M. Pratt, Sarah J. Berger, Ann M. Quigley and Michael A. Oxman, New York City, for respondent.

Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SIMONS, TITONE and BELLACOSA concur; Judges HANCOCK, JR., and LEVINE taking no part.

SMITH, J.

The primary issue on this appeal is whether 16 USC § 836 (the Niagara Redevelopment Act) and the contracts entered into pursuant to that act, as well as Public Authorities Law § 1005 (5), require the Power Authority of the State of New York (PASNY) to sell 445,000 kilowatts of replacement power produced by the Niagara Project at the cost of producing that power. We hold that nothing in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases