PER CURIAM.
Stanley Lukas appeals the judgment and sentence rendered following the jury verdict finding him guilty of two counts of resisting an officer without violence and one count of driving under the influence. We find merit only in his argument that the trial court erred by denying his motion for judgment of acquittal on the DUI charge.
Lukas' motion should have been granted because the evidence presented by the State
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.