Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
There is no merit to the defendant's claim that he was deprived of a fair trial as a result of the court's refusal to conduct an "independent source" hearing as to the identification testimony elicited from one of the People's eyewitnesses. Although the court initially ruled that the witness's identification testimony would be admissible because it was confirmatory (see, People v Rodriguez,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.