STATE v. LUNSFORD

No. C1-92-1079.

507 N.W.2d 239 (1993)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Daniel LUNSFORD, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied December 14, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, James C. Backstrom, Dakota County Atty., James M. Crow, Asst. County Atty., Hastings, for respondent.

Bradford S. Delapena, Sp. Asst. State Public Defender, St. Paul, for appellant.

Considered and decided by PARKER, P.J., and HUSPENI, and DAVIES, JJ.


OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

This appeal is from a judgment of conviction and sentence for first degree criminal sexual conduct. Minn.Stat. § 609.342, subd. 1(a) (1990). We affirm the conviction, and reverse and remand the sentence for findings on the applicability of the patterned sex offender statute.

FACTS

Ten-year-old J.K. reported in May of 1991 that his uncle, appellant Daniel Lunsford, had sexually abused him in 1989. Lunsford had...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases