Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that her conviction based upon accessorial liability was not supported by legally sufficient evidence. She asserts that, to the extent she may be said to have participated in the acts culminating in the fatal stabbing of the victim, she did not do so with the requisite intent. We disagree. Viewing the evidence adduced at the trial in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.