HOWARD JARVIS TAXPAYERS v. WHITTIER UN. HIGH SCH.

Docket No. B070561.

15 Cal.App.4th 730 (1993)

19 Cal. Rptr.2d 109

HOWARD JARVIS TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. WHITTIER UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

May 5, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Kaplanis & Grimm, Trevor A. Grimm and Jonathan M. Coupal for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Bell & Hiltachk and Thomas W. Hiltachk as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Richards, Watson & Gershon and Marsha Jones Moutrie for Defendants and Respondents.

Breon, O'Donnell, Miller, Brown & Dannis and Priscilla Brown as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents.


OPINION

GATES, J.

The instant case presents an issue of first impression, i.e.: May school districts qualify as "special districts" within the meaning of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the Act)? (Sts. & Hy. Code, § 22500 et seq.) The trial court concluded they do and entered summary judgment in favor of defendants Whittier Union High School District and Bonita Unified

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases