1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 193 A.D.2d
  5. 193 A.D.2d 550 (1993)
 

VINNIK v. VINNIK

193 A.D.2d 550 (1993)

598 N.Y.S.2d 943

Barbara B. Vinnik, Respondent, v. Daniel M. Vinnik, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 25, 1993

The relevant provision of the stipulation containing one express "very limited" exception, which is plainly inapplicable herein, should not be read to include an implicit limitation that the incurred medical expenses must be reasonable or necessary. No such provision is discernible in the plain meaning of the express language. We further note that defendant, an attorney, was represented by counsel at the execution of said...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases