U.S. v. IRVIN

Nos. 91-5454, 91-5373 and 91-5468.

2 F.3d 72 (1993)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Walter IRVIN; Michael L. Schumacher, Defendants-Appellants. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Santiago GONZALES; Walter Irvin; Michael L. Schumacher, Defendants-Appellees. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Santiago GONZALES, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided August 23, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Walter Franklin Green, IV, Green & O'Donnell, Harrisonburg, VA, argued for appellants Irvin and Schumacher and Terry Armentraut, Roger A. Ritchie & Associate, Harrisonburg, VA, argued for appellant Gonzales.

Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Roanoke, VA, argued (E. Montgomery Tucker, U.S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.

Before RUSSELL, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.


OPINION

WILKINS, Circuit Judge:

Walter D. Irvin and Michael L. Schumacher challenge their convictions and sentences for conspiracy to distribute and conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute cocaine and marijuana, see 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(a)(1) (West 1981); 21 U.S.C.A. §§ 846, 841(b)(1)(A)(ii)(II), 841(b)(1)(B)(vii) (West 1981 & Supp.1993), and conspiracy to import controlled substances into the United States, see...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases