EPSTEIN v. SRINIVASAN


190 A.D.2d 547 (1993)

Charles Epstein et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. B. Dobli Srinivasan, Appellant-Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

February 4, 1993


We agree with the IAS Court that plaintiff's visits to defendant in 1978 and 1980 did not involve continuing efforts to treat a particular condition, and that the doctrine of continuous treatment (CPLR 214-a) therefore does not apply to those visits and the attendant diagnoses (Curcio v Ippolito, 63 N.Y.2d 967; Nykorchuck v Henriques, 78 N.Y.2d 255, 258-259). However, the same cannot be...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases