BECK v. LAMPF, LIPKIND, PRUPIS & PETIGROW


273 N.J. Super. 462 (1993)

642 A.2d 436

ROBERT A. BECK, II, PLAINTIFF, v. LAMPF, LIPKIND, PRUPIS & PETIGROW, P.C., DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Essex County.

Decided November 10, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jay Starkman, for plaintiff (Starkman & Magolnick, P.A., attorneys).

William J. Prout, Jr., for defendant (Tompkins, McGuire & Wachenfeld, P.C., attorneys).


YANOFF, JSC (temporarily assigned, retired, on recall).

The issue here is the determination of costs, including travel expenses, for the taking of depositions of witnesses de bene esse in Florida. There is little controlling authority.

The relevant New Jersey statute is N.J.S.A. 22A:2-8 and the applicable rule is R. 4:42-8(a). N.J.S.A. 22A:2-8 provides for "The legal fees of witnesses, including mileage for each attendance, masters...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases