Defendant's first trial ended in a mistrial when a juror reported that she had overheard one police witness tell others to lie. Defendant's argument that the indictment should have been dismissed is without merit since the testimony of the complainant and defendant's accomplice was not tainted by the conversation. Also without merit is defendant's alternative argument that at the second trial he should have been permitted to call the officers involved in the conversation...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
