CRISCUOLA v. PASNY


81 N.Y.2d 649 (1993)

621 N.E.2d 1195

602 N.Y.S.2d 588

Joseph Criscuola et al., Appellants, v. Power Authority of the State of New York et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided October 12, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Rikon, P. C., New York City (Michael Rikon of counsel), for appellants.

Bond, Schoeneck & King, Albany (Carl Rosenbloom of counsel), Charles M. Pratt, New York City, and Crowell and Moring, of the District of Columbia Bar, admitted pro hac vice, for respondents.

Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SIMONS, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and SMITH concur; Judge LEVINE taking no part.


BELLACOSA, J.

Appellants are claimants who seek direct and consequential market value damages for a high voltage power line easement acquired by the Power Authority of the State of New York (PASNY) over their Delaware County property. The only issue before us centers on the claim for consequential damages, based on the claimants' assertion that "cancerphobia" and the public's perception of a health risk from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases