1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 263 N.J.
  5. 263 N.J. Super. 462 (1993)
 

DIVISION 819, TRANSIT UNION v. NJT

263 N.J. Super. 462 (1993)

623 A.2d 266

DIVISION 819, AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION, AN INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY TRANSIT BUS OPERATIONS, INC., A WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 8, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David S. Griffiths, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellants (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General, attorney; Mr. Griffiths, on the brief).

Richard P. Weitzman argued the cause for respondent (Weitzman & Weitzman, attorneys; Mr. Weitzman, on the brief).

Before Judges KING, BRODY and LANDAU.

The opinion of the court was delivered by LANDAU, J.A.D.

Defendant, New Jersey Transit Corporation (NJT), appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court, Law Division declaring that it "acquired" Monmouth County Bus Lines, Inc. (MBL) and, therefore, by operation of N.J.S.A. 27:25-14f, became obliged to assume and observe the pre-existing collective bargaining agreement between MBL and certain of its employees represented by Amalgamated Transit Union. The order...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases