Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the petitioner's argument, the respondent was not required to obtain its consent before settling the underlying action, as there was no provision in the policy requiring such consent (cf., Matter of State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. v Donath,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.