Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We find that the oral statements sought to be suppressed were not the product of a custodial interrogation. The defendant testified that he had gone to the police precinct voluntarily, without first talking to the police, after he heard that one of his roommates was there. Just outside the precinct, the defendant saw his roommate in the company of two police officers. His roommate told him that their other roommate
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.