Contrary to respondent's contention that the allegations of neglect were not proved beyond a preponderance of the evidence, the evidence presented by petitioner, thoroughly documented by the Family Court in its fact finding decision, overwhelmingly demonstrated respondent's failure to provide necessary medical care for David, which resulted in the need to remove his right eye (Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [A]), as well as the emotional impairment suffered by both David...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
