1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 190 A.D.2d
  5. 190 A.D.2d 527 (1993)
 

MATTER OF MELOHN v. NEW YORK STATE DIV. OF HOUS. & CMTY. RENEWAL

190 A.D.2d 527 (1993)

In the Matter of Martha Melohn, Appellant, v. New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, Respondent, and Simon Heifetz, Individually and as Tenant Representative of 100 Riverside Drive Tenants Committee, Intervenor-Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

February 2, 1993

The validity of respondent agency's requirement that an owner seeking a maximum base rent (MBR) increase must certify that at least 80% of all non-rent-impairing violations recorded against the property have been corrected (Administrative Code of City of NY § 26-405 [h] [6]) is settled (see, Matter of Barklee Realty Co. v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 159 A.D.2d 416

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases