1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 194 A.D.2d
  5. 194 A.D.2d 519 (1993)
 

HARFORD v. CITY OF NEW YORK

194 A.D.2d 519 (1993)

598 N.Y.S.2d 309

Stephen J. Harford, as Administrator of The Estate of Patricia Harford, Deceased, Appellant-Respondent, v. City of New York, Respondent, and Annemarie Cunningham et al., Respondents-Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

June 1, 1993

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, with one bill of costs payable to the respondent City of New York, by the appellant-respondent and the respondents-appellants.

It is well established that the decision as to whether to install a traffic control device is a discretionary governmental function which will not expose a municipality to liability (see, Weiss v Fote

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases