Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered. No questions of fact have been raised or considered.
We find that the trial court erred by permitting a witness to testify as to his prior identification of the defendant. The People's eyewitness initially testified that he identified Mark Cover as the perpetrator at the scene of the incident. However, when asked to make an in-court identification, the witness stated that the defendant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
