PEOPLE v. HYNES


193 A.D.2d 516 (1993)

598 N.Y.S.2d 182

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Patrick Hynes, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 20, 1993


Defendant's objection to the testimony of the arresting officer on hearsay grounds was insufficient to preserve his claim on appeal of prejudicial bolstering (People v Qualls, 55 N.Y.2d 733), and defendant cannot rely on objections to the undercover officer's testimony made by counsel for the codefendant to preserve the issue for appellate review as a matter of law (People v Buckley, 75 N.Y.2d 843

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases