NATIONWIDE MUT. INS. CO. v. TATE

No. 2093.

438 S.E.2d 266 (1993)

NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Richard Arnold TATE, and Unisun Insurance Company, f/k/a American Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Defendants, of whom Unisun Insurance Company, f/k/a American Mutual Fire Insurance Company is Respondent.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Decided December 6, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen D. Baggett and Roy R. Hemphill, both of Burns, McDonald, Bradford, Patrick & Dean, Greenwood, for appellant.

Theron G. Cochran, of Love, Thornton, Arnold & Thomason, Greenville, for respondent.


HOWELL, Chief Judge:

This is a declaratory judgment action brought by Nationwide Insurance Company to determine whether Unisun Insurance Company had a continuing duty to defend a lawsuit involving one of Unisun's insureds after Unisun had settled the claim and paid its limits of liability under one of its insurance policies. The trial court found that Nationwide had no standing to assert any claim against Unisun on its own behalf or on behalf of Unisun's insured....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases