Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
The defendant argues that his plea allocution under Indictment No. 16050/89 failed to establish that, at the time of his admitted participation in the robbery of the victim, he was "armed with a deadly weapon" (Penal Law § 160.15 [2]). This contention is not reviewable as a question of law, because the defendant did not move to withdraw his plea on this ground prior to the imposition of sentence (see, e.g., People...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
