Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
We reject the appellant's contention that the complainant's in-court identification was incredible as a matter of law. We also reject the appellant's contention that there was insufficient proof of "physical injury" to make out the crime of assault in the third degree (cf., People v Jimenez,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.