STATE v. FAYDO

Nos. 11956-4-III; 11957-2-III.

68 Wn. App. 621 (1993)

846 P.2d 539

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. EDWARD CHARLES FAYDO, ET AL, Appellants.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.

February 4, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert W. Critchlow and Law Offices of John Cooney & Associates, for appellants.

Donald C. Brockett, Prosecuting Attorney, and Kevin M. Korsmo, Deputy, for respondent.


THOMPSON, A.C.J.

Dana Faydo, a.k.a. Dana Kendall, and Edward Faydo appeal their bench trial convictions for possession of marijuana with intent to manufacture. They assign error to the court's refusal to suppress evidence of marijuana seized from their residence during a search pursuant to a warrant. They contend the information in the affidavit in support of the warrant was obtained by law enforcement from U S West security...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases