HERRERA v. TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH ORANGE


270 N.J. Super. 417 (1993)

637 A.2d 526

RUFINA HERRERA, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH ORANGE VILLAGE, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 28, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joan Pransky argued the cause for appellant (Seton Hall University School of Law Center for Social Justice, attorney).

David Schechner argued the cause for respondent Township (Schechner and Targan, attorneys).

Cheryl R. Clarke, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent Dep't of Community Affairs (Fred DeVesa, Acting Attorney General, attorney; Joseph L. Yannotti, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).

Before Judges MUIR, Jr., THOMAS and LEVY.


The opinion of the court was delivered by MUIR, Jr., J.A.D.

Petitioner Rufina Herrera appeals from a final determination of the Commissioner of the Department of Community Affairs. The Commissioner held that Herrera is not entitled to relocation assistance benefits under either the Relocation Assistance Law of 1967, N.J.S.A. 52:31B-1 to -12, or the Relocation Assistance Act, N.J.S.A. 20:4-1 to -22, as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases