1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 8 F.3d
  5. 8 F.3d 673 (1993)
 

U.S. v. TUCKER

No. 87-5090.

8 F.3d 673 (1993)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Homer Lee TUCKER, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided October 29, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elizabeth N. Brancart and Christopher Brancart, Brancart & Brancart, Pasadena, CA, for defendant-appellant.

Miriam A. Krinsky, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG, FLETCHER, NORRIS, BEEZER, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, RYMER, T.G. NELSON, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

Argued and Submitted En Banc June 24, 1993.

WALLACE, Chief Judge:

We are called upon in this appeal to consider the limits on our supervisory powers. Tucker contends that we have the power and obligation to reverse his criminal conviction and dismiss the indictment against him because of excessive delay in hearing his appeal due to the failure of a court reporter to file a transcript of his trial in a timely manner. We hold that we may not exercise our supervisory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases