MURRAY v. STEMPSON

No. 91-SP-1479.

633 A.2d 48 (1993)

James MURRAY, Appellant, v. Douglas STEMPSON, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided November 10, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lee H. Karlin, Washington, DC, appointed by the court, for appellant.

Mary L. Wilson, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom John Payton, Corp. Counsel, and Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Washington, DC, were on the brief, for appellee.

Before STEADMAN and KING, Associate Judges, and REILLY, Senior Judge.


KING, Associate Judge:

In this appeal, appellant contends the trial court erred in denying his pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus, in which he claimed that he has not received the good time credits he is entitled to receive under the District of Columbia Good Time Credits Act of 1986 ("Good Time Credits Act").1 The trial court denied the petition, without a hearing, ruling that habeas corpus relief was not appropriate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases