RUDNITSKY v. ROBBINS


191 A.D.2d 488 (1993)

594 N.Y.S.2d 354

Theodore Rudnitsky, Respondent, v. Marvin S. Robbins et al., Defendants, and Ain, Jonas, Libert & Weinstein, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

March 8, 1993


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In 1978 the plaintiff orally retained an attorney, Marvin Robbins, to pursue a claim for damages against the City of New York. Robbins alleges that at the time he was in the employ of the firm of Milton Jonas, a solo practitioner. In 1980 Jonas ceased operation as a solo practitioner and became a partner of a new firm known as Ain, Jonas, Libert &...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases