HAMILL v. HAMILL


196 A.D.2d 481 (1993)

600 N.Y.S.2d 765

Peter Hamill, Respondent, v. Denis Hamill et al., Defendants, and Joan Hamill, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

August 2, 1993


Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant-appellant Joan Hamill's main defense to the present action to foreclose a mortgage consists of a claim that the plaintiff mortgagee Peter Hamill conspired with his brother, her estranged husband, Denis Hamill, to defraud her. At a hearing before the Referee, the evidence established that Peter Hamill purchased the mortgage from the original mortgagee in August 1986, after Joan Hamill and her...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases