STATE v. SHAWN P.

Nos. 59585-2, 60037-6.

122 Wn.2d 553 (1993)

859 P.2d 1220

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. SHAWN P., Petitioner. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. DAVID W., Petitioner. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. DANIEL W., Petitioner.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

October 21, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey J. Jahns and Ronald D. Ness & Associates, for petitioner Shawn P.

David W., pro se, and J. Scott Bougher, for petitioners David W. and Daniel W.

John W. Ladenburg, Prosecuting Attorney for Pierce County, Chris Quinn-Brintnall, Senior Appellate Deputy, and John M. Neeb, Deputy; C. Danny Clem, Prosecuting Attorney for Kitsap County, and Pamela B. Loginsky, Deputy, for respondent.


ANDERSEN, C.J.

FACTS OF CASE

The issue in these three consolidated appeals is whether the mandatory revocation of driving privileges, which is imposed upon minor teenagers who are convicted of consuming or possessing alcohol, violates the equal protection guaranties of our state and federal constitutions. We hold the revocation provisions in Washington's "abuse and lose" statutes1 constitutionally sound.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases