We agree with the IAS Court that the law firm representing respondents should not be disqualified, the firm having obtained Ellerbe Becket's clearly informed consent to its simultaneous representation of Ellerbe Becket and respondents in two unrelated matters by different attorneys working out of different offices in different cities (see, Code of Professional Responsibility DR 5-105 [C] [22 NYCRR 1200.24 [c]; Unified Sewerage Agency v Jelco Inc.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF WELTON BECKET ASSOCS. v. LLJV DEV. CORP.
193 A.D.2d 477 (1993)
597 N.Y.S.2d 398
In the Matter of Welton Becket Associates et al., Appellants, et al., Petitioner, v. LLJV Development Corp. et al., Respondents
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 18, 1993
May 18, 1993
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.