RICHTMYRE v. STATE

No. 1 CA-CV 91-0224.

175 Ariz. 489 (1993)

858 P.2d 322

Arthur and Martha RICHTMYRE, husband and wife, Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. STATE of Arizona, Defendant/Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department D.

August 26, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Grant Woods, Atty. Gen., Tucson by Charles R. Pyle and Terrence E. Harrison, Asst. Attys. Gen., Phoenix, for defendant/appellant.

Aspey, Watkins & Diesel by Donald H. Bayles, Jr. and Zachary Markham, Flagstaff, for plaintiffs/appellees.


OPINION

SCHNEIDER, Judge.

The issue raised in this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in granting appellees' motion for new trial. The basis of the motion was the allegation that a juror concealed his bias and prejudice during voir dire. We reverse the trial court's order granting a new trial because the evidence relied on by the court in making its determination of voir dire misconduct was inadmissible. Rule 606(b), Arizona Rules of Evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases