KING v. RYAN


262 N.J. Super. 401 (1993)

621 A.2d 68

WILLIAM C. KING, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. GERRY D. RYAN, FRANK A. VATALARE, JOHN KRZEMINSKI, INDIVIDUALLY, JOINTLY, SEVERALLY AND/OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE AND AS THEIR CAPACITY AS POLICE COMMITTEE OF THE BOROUGH OF SOUTH BOUND BROOK, BOROUGH COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF SOUTH BOUND BROOK AND CHIEF RICHARD MIGNELLA, SOUTH BOUND BROOK POLICE DEPARTMENT, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 2, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Susan S. Rankin argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Donington, Karcher, Leroe, Salmond, Luongo, Ronan, & Connell, attorneys; Nicholas J. Stroumtsos, Jr., of counsel and on the brief).

William T. Cooper, III argued the cause for defendants-respondents (William T. Cooper, attorney).

Before Judges PRESSLER, MUIR, Jr. and KESTIN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by PRESSLER, P.J.A.D.

This is a municipal police disciplinary matter. Plaintiff William C. King, a patrolman employed by the Borough of South Bound Brook, appeals from a judgment of the Law Division, entered after a de novo proceeding pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40A:14-150 sustaining his removal from office by the borough's police committee on the ground of indictable misconduct...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases