1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 500 N.W.2d
  5. 500 N.W.2d 161 (1993)
 

SANBORN MFG. CO. v. CURRIE

No. C1-93-301.

500 N.W.2d 161 (1993)

SANBORN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Respondent, v. Charles CURRIE, Appellant, Quincy Compression, a Division of Coltec Industries, Inc., Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

May 25, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard A. Ross, Cynthia A. Jokela, Fredrickson & Byron, P.C., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Kay Nord Hunt, J. Christopher Cuneo, Lommen, Nelson, Cole & Stageberg, P.A., Minneapolis, for appellant.

Considered and decided by CRIPPEN, P.J., and NORTON and DAVIES, JJ.

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant Charles Currie challenges the trial court's temporary injunction prohibiting him from breaching a noncompetition agreement. Appellant argues that respondent Sanborn Manufacturing Company failed to show irreparable harm and a likelihood of success on the merits, and thus it was not entitled to a temporary injunction. We agree that Sanborn failed to show any likelihood of success on the merits and we reverse.

FACTS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases