Defendant failed to object to any of the testimony he now claims constituted improper hearsay and bolstering, and thus failed to preserve the issue for appellate review as a matter of law (CPL 470.05). In any event, the repetitive testimony of the complainant regarding her observations of defendant was for the most part elicited by defendant in an attempt to question the accuracy of those observations, and did not constitute hearsay (People v Candelario,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. MORGAN
193 A.D.2d 467 (1993)
597 N.Y.S.2d 364
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Darryl Morgan, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 13, 1993
May 13, 1993
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
