1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 500 N.W.2d
  5. 500 N.W.2d 158 (1993)
 

BENTON v. MUTUAL OF OMAHA INS. CO.

No. C8-92-1693.

500 N.W.2d 158 (1993)

George R. BENTON, Respondent, v. MUTUAL OF OMAHA INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, Minnesota State Bar Association, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied July 19, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Duane E. Arndt, Arndt & Benton, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Robert S. Cragg, Cragg & Fobbe, Hopkins, for appellant.

Considered and decided by CRIPPEN, P.J., and DAVIES and AMUNDSON, JJ.

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

This case concerns the standards governing notification to an insured about reductions in insurance benefits.

FACTS

In 1975, respondent George R. Benton obtained an accident and disability insurance policy from appellant Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company. Benton acquired the policy through his membership in the Minnesota State Bar Association. The association had negotiated a master policy group insurance contract...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases