MEEKS v. CITY OF NEW YORK


193 A.D.2d 465 (1993)

597 N.Y.S.2d 363

Pearl Meeks, Appellant, v. City of New York, Respondent. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 13, 1993


The testimony regarding post traumatic arthritis was properly precluded by the Trial Judge. Not only did plaintiff fail to include this condition in her bill of particulars (see, Ciriello v Virgues, 156 A.D.2d 417, 418-419), but the doctor who was to testify about said condition noted that in cases concerning injuries similar to plaintiff's, there was only a 35 to 45 per cent chance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases