DIAMANTSTEIN v. FRIEDMAN


199 A.D.2d 458 (1993)

606 N.Y.S.2d 16

Raoul Diamantstein, Appellant, v. Samuel D. Friedman, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

December 27, 1993


Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law and the facts, and a new trial is granted on the issue of liability with respect to statements made to Moses Neuman and Dov Hikind, and on the issue of damages, with costs to abide the event.

The plaintiff brought this action as a result of three statements made by the defendant, his business partner, to persons known to the plaintiff. All three statements, in varying fashion, accused the plaintiff of stealing money...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases