Contrary to defendant's claim on appeal, the evidence was sufficient to convict and the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. The jury could properly credit the testimony of two eyewitnesses, who testified they knew defendant from the neighborhood and were present when he fatally shot the victim. Moreover, they both knew defendant by his nickname, and agreed on how he was dressed at the time of the shooting. The eyewitness who identified defendant in a lineup...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
