426 BLOOMFIELD CORP. v. NEWARK


262 N.J. Super. 384 (1993)

621 A.2d 59

426 BLOOMFIELD AVENUE CORPORATION T/A C & J TOWING SERVICE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF NEWARK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND METROPOLITAN TOWING, J.V. AND K & K TOWING, INC., INTERVENING DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 23, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George W. Fisher argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Mason, Griffin & Pierson, attorneys; Mr. Fisher, of counsel and on the brief).

Frederick Coles, III, Assistant Corporation Counsel, argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Michelle Hollar-Gregory, Corporation Counsel, attorney; Mr. Coles, on the brief).

Intervening defendant-respondent, Metropolitan Towing, J.V., submitted a brief (Harvey Fruchter, attorney; Richard A. Cohen, on the brief).

The brief of intervening defendant-respondent K & K Towing was suppressed.

Before Judges MICHELS, BILDER and BAIME.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BAIME, J.A.D.

The City of Newark contracts with private entities for the provision of vehicle towing and storage services. In 1991, the City adopted a resolution creating five towing districts and mandating that no single vendor be awarded more than one district contract. The effect of the restriction is to eliminate from consideration the lowest responsible bid with respect to

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases